Alexander had been shot in the head and stabbed 27 times. His throat had been cut from ear to ear.
When
DNA proved Arias had been there, she then claimed that she and
Alexander had been attacked by two masked killers in a home invasion.
She said she didn’t go to the police because she was still in fear of
them.
It was not until years after his death that she admitted to killing Alexander in what she said was an act of self-defense.
“Lying
isn’t typically something I just do,” Arias told the court. “The lies
I’ve told in this case can be tied directly back to either protecting
Travis’ reputation or my involvement in his death … because I was very
ashamed.”
The defense team has attacked Alexander’s character in
an attempt to show he was a sex-obsessed womanizer who m*st*u*r*b*a*ted
to photos of little boys.
Although
accusations of abuse and pedophilia can prove detrimental, the defense
in this case has one problem: All such allegations came from one source —
Arias, an admitted liar who is on trial for her life.
The
prosecutors seemed to have an easier time. Although they did not have a
murder weapon, they did have a motive, contending Arias was consumed
with jealousy, and they had Arias’ confession to the slaying. For a
first-degree murder charge to stick, however, jurors will have to
conclude that she acted with premeditation.
The defense had to
try to explain why someone acting in self-defense would stab her
assailant multiple times, shoot him and cut his throat. That challenge
was compounded by the fact that Arias claimed memory loss covering much
of the day that Alexander was killed.
The prosecution, meanwhile,
argued that she made attempts to clean up the crime scene and disposed
of the handgun used in the shooting.
Other issues likely to come up in the jury room:
THE
CUTS: There were cuts on Arias’ fingers. She said she nicked herself at
work when she broke a glass. Prosecutors alleged those lacerations came
while knifing Alexander. A blood-covered knife typically becomes
slippery and slides through the hand of the person wielding it, often
resulting in wounds.
THE FINGER: Arias had a broken and
disfigured finger. She said it happened months prior to Alexander’s
death and was a result of his physical abuse. Prosecutors allege she
hurt herself during the killing, and that’s why the injury is not
visible in photos shown to the jurors that were taken after she claimed
the injury occurred.
GAS CANS: Arias took two gas cans with her
and purchased a third when she went on her final road trip to visit
Alexander. Arias testified the cans were a precautionary measure, so she
would not run out of fuel while traveling through the desert.
Prosecutors said she had them so she would not have to make fuel
purchases that could tie her to the area. Arias said she returned one
can to Walmart and received a cash refund without a receipt.
Prosecutors said the exchange never occurred and presented a Walmart
employee who testified there was no record of the transaction.
THE
GUN: Prior to Alexander’s killing, a .25-caliber handgun was stolen
from Arias’ grandparents’ home. Alexander was killed with a .25-caliber
firearm, but Arias claimed it was Alexander’s own gun, despite the lack
of evidence that he had ever owned a firearm.
What is bizarre
about some of Arias’ claims is that they are irrelevant in the grand
scheme. Once she admitted she had killed Alexander, why argue about some
of these little things? In the
case of her finger, Arias’ version of events was an attempt to show
prior domestic abuse, but it might have served her better if she had
played it differently. As for the gas can, what was the point in saying
she’d returned one and then being contradicted by a witness?
It is all these details that Arias has woven into her story that could ultimately be her undoing.
Although
the prosecution appears to be ahead, anything is possible. Prosecutors
must prove their case, after all. Many trial watchers were convinced Casey Anthony would be found guilty of murdering her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, but the jury held otherwise.
Nothing
is certain until the moment the verdict is read, and in a death penalty
case such as this, it could take a jury several days to weigh each
factor.

No comments:
Post a Comment